Overview
The Supreme Court of India has taken note of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that raises serious questions about the fairness, transparency, and credibility of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) in accrediting higher education institutions across India. Notices have been issued to the University Grants Commission (UGC), the Ministry of Education, and NAAC to respond to the issues flagged in the petition.
About the PIL
The PIL was filed by Nostro Destino Foundation, a Delhi-based NGO. It alleges systemic irregularities in the accreditation process of NAAC. The petition aims to bring judicial scrutiny to the procedures, accountability mechanisms, and overall integrity of the accreditation framework.
Key Issues Raised in the PIL
- CBI Investigation into Corruption
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) recently launched a case against several NAAC officials who allegedly accepted bribes—including cash and valuables—from a college in Andhra Pradesh to grant it an A++ accreditation. - Removal of Assessors
Following internal investigations, nearly 900 peer assessors were removed from NAAC’s evaluation panels. However, institutions assessed by these individuals were not subjected to reevaluation, raising doubts about the authenticity of their current accreditation status. - Lack of Oversight and Review
The PIL also criticizes the absence of a transparent review mechanism within NAAC and a lack of clarity about how institutional scores are computed and verified.
How NAAC Accreditation Works
NAAC, an autonomous body under the UGC established in 1994, accredits colleges and universities across India based on various qualitative and quantitative metrics.
- Step 1: Self-Study Report (SSR)
Institutions submit a self-assessment document detailing academic performance, infrastructure, governance, and more. - Step 2: Data Validation
The submitted data undergoes software-based scrutiny. Clarifications may be requested. - Step 3: Peer Team Visit
A panel of academic assessors visits the institution, evaluates it on-site, and submits a detailed report. - Final Score Calculation
The final score is based on 70% weightage from data provided by the institution and 30% from the peer team’s findings.
Supreme Court’s Stand
A bench headed by Justice P.S. Narasimha emphasized the need for a deeper probe into NAAC’s functioning. The Court remarked, “We wish to go deep into the matter and know how it (NAAC) is functioning.”
The Supreme Court’s directive to the UGC, Ministry of Education, and NAAC is seen as a move toward enhancing transparency and restoring trust in the accreditation process.
Potential Implications
- For Institutions:
Re-accreditation may be mandated for institutions evaluated by the assessors under scrutiny. - For Policy and Governance:
The case could prompt a revamp of the NAAC framework, introducing stronger checks and third-party audits. - For Students and Employers:
The credibility of NAAC grades is critical, as they influence admissions, hiring decisions, and access to grants.
Conclusion
This development has placed India’s higher education quality assurance framework under national scrutiny. The outcome of this case could lead to sweeping reforms in the accreditation process, ensuring that the future of educational institutions and their students is backed by a fair and accountable system.
Curated by the team at Bold Voices.
BoldVoices.in 
Leave a comment